Remember Endo?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court decision of Korematsu v. United States, which declared the removal of Japanese-Americans constitutional is often cited as important, albeit wrong, constitutional jursidprudence.? Ex parte Endo, which closed the Japanese-American relocation camps is virtually ignored.? However, in its way the Endo case is just as important a constitutional case as Korematsu.

Constitutional Procedures, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Detention of persons, Detention, Japanese Americans, 1940s (Decade) AD, Japanese American Internment, 1942-1945

---

Plaintiff due process rights in assertions of personal jurisdiction

Article Abstract:

In deciding on personal jurisdiction matters, courts only consider the defendants' right to be free from the overreaching of the jurisdiction. However, plaintiffs have property rights in their causes of action which should also be considered. Personal jurisdiction decisions should thus take into account due process considerations for the plaintiff as well as the defendant.

Courts, Due Process, Right to Sue, Personal jurisdiction, Due process of law, Right of property, Property rights, Right of action

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Indefinite detention of immigrant parolees: an unconstitutinal condition? Privatization and accountability
• Abstracts: International law as an interpretive force in federal Indian law. After Sandoval: judicial challenges and administrative possiblities in Title VI enforcement
• Abstracts: Website libel and the single publication rule. The color of crime: the case against race-based suspect descriptions

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.