Japanese are stung on patents; lawyers alarmed by secret meeting rumors
Article Abstract:
Japanese patent claims are very narrow compared to those in the US, and tend to offer very little protection in the US business world. In the case of Honeywell Inc v Minolta Camera Co, Minolta was found to have infringed Honeywell's patent, and experts predict that Japanese patents will continue to lose out in US infringement litigation. The inadequate protection afforded by Japanese patents is also evident in the negative balance of payments for the transfer of technology. In an attempt to cope with this problem, Japan in 1987 adopted a revised system allowing patent claims to be broader.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Schools get more power over professors' patents; the suit involved licensing of MRI technology by the University of California
Article Abstract:
A federal district court ruled in Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California that a public university's duty was to manage patents for the broad benefit of the public and that it could thus decide on the fees to be charged for licensing its technology. The plaintiffs were former university researchers who felt the fee the university charged for licensing the patent for a process invented by the researchers which was used in magnetic resonance imaging technology was too low. The researchers contended that this fee violated the university's patent policy and their labor contract.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
BCCI suit: far-flung, massive; lawyers handle case of astounding dimensions
Article Abstract:
More than 1.2 million plaintiffs around the world are suing the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) over lost deposits in the largest bank fraud case ever. The case is providing work for many lawyers who would normally never get involved in a huge international class-action suit. The leading plaintiff's attorney, William S. Lerach, expects the case to last several years and cost at least $1 million.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Attorneys' fees in class actions governed by fee-shifting statutes. Failure of named representatives in a class action to satisfy the statute of limitations
- Abstracts: Special report: new Article 9. Security interest in patent after Cybernetic Services. A lessor's meaningful residual interest: using TRAC leases as an object lesson
- Abstracts: Changes affecting life insurance enacted by new laws. How to compare long-term care insurance policies. Extracting hidden value from unwanted life insurance policies
- Abstracts: Organizing patterns and certification success rates of left and non-left unions. Union shop authorization polls: an historical re-examination
- Abstracts: Expert sues three law firms; claims defendants conspired to destroy consulting business. Texas judge sues colleagues; claims her dissent should be filed even though she did not hear case