Liberating abstraction
Article Abstract:
Republican judges such as Frank H. Easterbrook interpret powers and rights asymmetrically, enhancing government powers while limiting individual rights. Powers are interpreted at a higher level of abstraction than rights, but they should instead be treated at the same level. For example, extending the power to regulate commerce to the regulation of pollution is not questioned, but an analogous extension of the concept of property to include privacy in the case of Bowers v Hardwick is controversial. The jurisprudence of Robert Jackson during the New Deal illustrates the use of abstraction in interpreting rights.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Abstraction and authority
Article Abstract:
The level of abstraction used in constitutional interpretation is constrained by the need to justify judicial power, so no single level can be imposed by theory. In new areas of law where legal principles have yet to be established, the level of abstraction must be low. In other cases, the legal texts themselves dictate the level of abstraction at which they should be interpreted. The authority of judicial review depends on the power of the past, in the form of the Constitution and judicial precedent, which limits judicial creativity. Political novelty is reserved for the legislature.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Our unconventional founding
Article Abstract:
The Federalists set a precedent for revolutionary reform that was later followed by Republicans during the Reconstruction and by New Deal Democrats. The Federalists changed the requirements for ratification of the Constitution from those specified in the Articles of Confederation. However, they did so by adapting established institutions and by gaining widespread popular support, a process which enabled them to institute change without making a complete break with the preexisting system.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Practical concerns affecting the arbitration of statutory claims. Labor-management dispute resolution and the media
- Abstracts: Guidelines for avoiding estate litigation. Effective drafting strategies for family limited partnerships. Choosing a formula clause based on funding effects
- Abstracts: Time off; business travel can hold key to vacation pleasure. part 2 In search of higher interest; alternatives to money-market funds and CDs
- Abstracts: Minimizing arbitrator "reversals" in discipline and discharge cases. Recent findings and practices in grievance-arbitration procedures
- Abstracts: Reinventing the regulatory state. Behavioral analysis of law. Free speech now