Microsoft judge gets decision 'roadmap;' proposed findings of fact in historic case have a few surprises
Article Abstract:
Federal district judge Thomas Penfield Jackson must study the differing views of the findings of fact submitted by each side in the Microsoft Corp. antitrust case, and it is not surprising that they present diametrically opposed views of the facts. The government's brief fails to address a fundamental element of proof that is fatal to its claims, that Microsoft's actions denied the Netscape Communications Corp. access to the marketplace. The brief also does not confront the 40% threshold the judge set for the level of foreclosure needed to prove Microsoft's contracts constituted exclusive dealing.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Gillette gets nicked in court; bullying litigation strategy backfires in suit against Norelco
Article Abstract:
The article discusses Gillette Co's dismay at the Norelco Consumer Products Div entering the electric razor market, which Gillette dominates and how Gillette's lawsuit claimed that Norelco's commercials for a razor targeted one of its products. This false advertising suit ended badly for Gillette, with its witnesses forced to admit that the very executives who participated in a decision to sue Norelco later designing the tests it used as proof, allowing Norelco to suggest bias.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Huge fees don't foil his company. Directing change at ITT industries
- Abstracts: Judge for the situation: Judge Jack Weinstein, creator of temporary administrative agencies. Tribute to the Honorable Jack Weinstein
- Abstracts: The benefits broker in the marketplace: self-funding of group insurance benefits. Employee benefit planning
- Abstracts: E-mails helped Microsoft in Conn. Two jurors disliked the reference to a 'we sue' business plan. Bork: have I told you the one about 'Lorain Journal'? The 'judge,' again, says one case dooms Microsoft. But he sounds a bit different
- Abstracts: Wishing on Winstar; S&L case may light the way for utility, housing suits. A penchant for privacy; court discourages advocates angling for openness