Neither equal nor just: the rationing and denial of legal services to the poor when life and liberty are at stake
Article Abstract:
Many states continue to deny impoverished criminal defendants and convicted criminals their constitutional right to adequate legal counsel despite the Supreme Court's landmark 1963 Gideon v. Wainwright decision, which held that a poor person facing felony charges cannot be assured a fair trial unless an attorney is provided for him. Defendants are often given attorneys who are inexperienced or incompetent and many prisoners are denied any representation. Individual lawyers who zealously represent poor clients set the example for realizing the goal of equal representation for rich and poor alike.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Success in New Jersey: using the charitable turst doctrine to preserve women's reproductive services when hospitals become Catholic
Article Abstract:
When secular and Catholic hospitals merge, reproductive services to women are often ended. In some locations, charitable trust laws have been used to force such hospitals to fund continued services, but local and state governments should be more sensitive to these concerns.
Publication Name: New York University Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The political roots of the judicial dilemma. Tribute to the Honorable Patricia M. Wald. Comment: rulemaking ossification - a modest proposal
- Abstracts: Title VII's tangled tale: the erosion and confusion of disparate impact and the business necessity defense. The reasonable accommodation difference: the effect of applying the burden shifting frameworks developed under Title VII in disparate treatment cases to claims brought under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Abstracts: Progress and jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Amplifying the World Court's jurisdiction through counter-claims and third-party intervention
- Abstracts: Inconsistency and impunity in international human rights law: Can the International Criminal Court solve the problems raised by the Rwanda and Augusto Pinochet cases
- Abstracts: Whither deregulation: a look at the portents. Protecting privacy from technological intrusions