No bad puns: a different approach to the problem of personal jurisdiction and the Internet
Article Abstract:
The traditional tests for personal jurisdiction when a defendant has no physical presence in the forum in which the suit is being brought are severly tested by the Internet. Of the three-part test for personal jurisdiction, only the second part, which asks if the suit arises out of the defendant's contacts in the forum, can truly operate to limit personal jurisdiction in Internet cases. Even this part can only effectively limit jurisdiction if the stricter "proximate cause" test is used, rather than the broader "but-for approach".
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2003
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Copyright law - Congress responds to Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel's webcasting rates
Article Abstract:
The Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel was set up by the federal government to determine royalties for music broadcast on the Internet. The panel's final rate structure would have put many smaller webcasters out of business. In response, Congress passed the Small Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002.
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2003
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Far-reaching changes: the future expansion of personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
- Abstracts: U.S. patent policy vs. the harmonization treaty patent policy. Essay: patent harmonization, protectionism, and legislation
- Abstracts: Valuing undivided interests: a new approach to an old problem. What powers can a donor retain over transferred property?
- Abstracts: Disaster in Durban: the United Nations World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance
- Abstracts: Court ducks larger privilege issues yet again. Waiver raised to the second power: waivers of evidentiary privileges by lawyers representing accused being tried in absentia