Qui tam pop quiz; a surprise order asks whether whistleblowers must have standing
Article Abstract:
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens is discussed, and is a case pending before the US Supreme Court with the issue of whether the 11th Amendment permits relators to sue states for fraud against the federal government.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Rolling on the river; standing ruling in water suit gives environmentalists more than they sought
Article Abstract:
Issues are discussed regarding The US Supreme Court ruling in Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw on citizens' ability to sue to enforce environmental laws. Enough fear of environmental harm that plaintiffs stopped using the river in question was ruled sufficient evidence of injury
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Not under my roof you don't; courts split on religious liberty vs. discrimination in landlord/tenant disputes
Article Abstract:
Two courts reached opposite conclusions in cases charging landlords refusing to rent to unmarried couples for religious reasons with violations of civil rights. The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in the 1998 case of McCready v. Hoffius that the Michigan civil rights law did not violate constitutional religious liberties guaranteed the landlords.The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held in Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission that the state's marital-status discrimination law could not be enforced against landlords refusing to rent to unmarried couples for religious reasons.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Just wait 'til your Dad logs on! Virtual visitation is catching on to resolve child custody disputes. Bush vs. Gore: evermore
- Abstracts: Under covered; proponents say fewer lawyers will go bare if forced to disclose their insurance status. Inexpert witness; lies, resume fraud takes down 'expert' before he takes stand again
- Abstracts: Discovery; you're on un-candid camera. Discovery; opponent deponents. Discovery; views on video
- Abstracts: Cost-cutting consequences; an HMO liability case is being closely watched by the lawyers who targeted tobacco companies