Predispute ADR raises fairness issue; courts have not hesitated to enforce arbitration agreements except when the fairness of the process is compromised
Article Abstract:
Since the US Supreme Court's 1991 decision in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp there has been little doubt of the legality of using arbitration to resolve workplace discrimination claims. The question has been the fairness of the process and recent cases show that courts will enforce predispute arbitration agreements except when the fairness of the process has been compromised. In view of the increasing interest in arbitration as a cost control method, the cases are instructive. Guidelines for such agreements are given.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
In support of mandatory arbitration of statutory employment disputes
Article Abstract:
Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes is an important viable alternative to employment litigation, which is growing at an alarming rate. Most workers and many in management favor arbitration because it quickens the dispute resolution process. Case law favors the use and legality of mandatory arbitration. For example, the 1991 Gilmer ruling requires arbitration agreements to be honored by employees in age discrimination disputes, a ruling which has been extended to other types of employment discrimination litigation.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Challenges to employment ADR: processes, rather than principles, are at issue
Article Abstract:
A number of court cases have challenged the processes involved in mandatory employment alternative dispute resolution (ADR) policies. While accepting the fundamental principle of ADR, these cases challenge the enforcement of ADR policies on grounds of fairness. The cases have been variously based on the lack of voluntary waiver of litigation rights, insufficient notice and understanding of waiver, and the absence of procedural safeguards prohibiting the retaliatory use of ADR.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Administering international arbitration proceedings; explanation of how the AAA's program works. The role of the international arbitrator
- Abstracts: A splintered privilege; two judges have taken exception to tobacco's confidentiality claims. Fear at an Oct. meeting spurs Liggett settlement; parties step up talks after news of congressional plan
- Abstracts: MBA lawyer means business in-house. A reshaped staff signaled success. Managing his own lawyers' paper trail