Recent court opinions affecting USPTO trademark practice: the year in review
Article Abstract:
The authors review trademark cases decided by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in the year 2000.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Notable court decisions affecting PTO trademark practice
Article Abstract:
Trademark law decisions by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office are reviewed.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2003
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Principal opinions affecting PTO trademark practice
Article Abstract:
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and its principal reviewing court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, issued important rulings in trademark law in 1998. Included was the ruling that resolution of likelihood of confusion claims must specify the du Pont factors relied upon. Other issues dealt with include the elements necessary to maintain an opposition, abandonment through nonuse, the false suggestion of connection, and when a mark is merely descriptive.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Attention attorneys! How to achieve the best results in mediation. ADR: new challenges, new roles and new opportunities
- Abstracts: Coast to coast to court; beach suits are a familifamiliar part of the summer scene. Jailed spy escapes in circuits' split over wire fraud
- Abstracts: Parallel district court and ITC patent infringement actions and PTO interferences. A critique of recent opinions in patent interferences