Rigged forum and silenced media: why Bill Gates can't lose in the U.S. courts
Article Abstract:
The Microsoft Corp. is unlikely to lose the Justice Department's 1999 antitrust challenge because the courts have been packed for 20 years with pro-monopoly advocates such as Posner and Scalia and the press, key to the earlier US trustbusting movement, is no longer likely to report honestly on the issue as it has itself been effectively monopolized. Posts to antitrust Internet discussion groups are listed.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The Microsoft case: trial court's 'finding of fact'
Article Abstract:
The author presents the Microsoft Corp. antitrust case finding of fact with comments regarding Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's findings.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Performing due diligence with respect to life insurance trusts is crucial. Premium financing: the last choice, not the first choice
- Abstracts: It didn't take long for him to be tested. He gets the best seats in the house. His story, in short, is worth reading
- Abstracts: That 'other' antitrust trial; FTC's case against Intel is no 'U.S. v. Microsoft.'. Lessons of spin at the Visa trial; one defendant sticks to the law, the other to the bogeyman
- Abstracts: A blueprint for understanding copyright ownership in architectural works. Arbitration train runs out of track
- Abstracts: Corporate law; defining privilege. Litigation; joint defense issues. Privilege issues; subpoena by Congress