Securing a durable mediation agreement to settle complex employment disputes
Article Abstract:
Negotiating a durable settlement in an employment dispute requires attention to many issues. Some of the issues that may arise include financial matters such as wages and other monetary benefits; other fringe benefits such as health insurance, stock options and retirement benefits; payment of fees and costs related to the mediation procedure; emotional needs; the type of termination, which may be voluntary resignation, involuntary termination, layoff or retirement; references; confidentiality; releases and waivers; and provisions in case of breach of the agreement.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Emerging due process standards in arbitration of employment discrimination disputes: new challenges for employers
Article Abstract:
Many employers have adopted arbitration clauses after Gilmer v. Interstate, in which the US Supreme Court held that the clauses were enforceable. ADR is seen as a way to speed trials and reduce costs but concerns have been raised over employees' civil rights, especially in non-union workplaces. Employers should not make the arbitration clauses mandatory or coercive because the courts may elect not to enforce them. Judicial review of arbitration decisions is allowed in non-union workplaces and so employee rights need to be protected for the clauses to be effective.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Arbitrability, preemption, and preclusion: developing issues in age discrimination claims
Article Abstract:
Gilmer v Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp and Britt v Grocers Supply Co restrict an age discrimination plaintiff's right to judicial review when arbitration agreements exist and where actions are preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The judges in Gilmer held that an arbitral forum was as equitable as a judicial one for Age Discrimination in Employment Act purposes. In Britt, the federal district court held that the NLRA preempts other claims when non-NLRA claims are similar to those that would be decided under the NLRA.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Survey of 92 key companies using ADR to settle employment disputes. Just cause in the arbitration of sexual harassment cases
- Abstracts: Federal taxation of foreign trusts: coping with a complex regime. (part 1). Prop. regs. on ESBTs: more guidance for family trusts owning S stock
- Abstracts: The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989: foundation for the modern law of employment dissent. In from the cold: the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998
- Abstracts: Looking back; reflections on a life well-spent. How judges view retrial of L.A. cops. In political year, ABA policies are something to talk about
- Abstracts: Learning disabilities and employment: a comprehensive overview and proposal for uniformity. AIDS and the ADA: maneuvering through a legal minefield