Some observations on SEC rule 144 and venture capital limited partnerships and corporations: revisited
Article Abstract:
The treatment of restricted securities sales for distributee limited partners receiving pro rata venture capital limited partnership distributions is effected by SEC rule 144. The rule allows limited partnerships to combine their holding period with that of each nonaffiliate distributee limited partner's holding period. A period of three years or more falls under 144(k) which does not require aggregation, while a period between two and three years requires aggregation among distributee limited partners. Rule 144(k) holds any securities freely saleable if held for three years by a nonaffiliate shareholder.
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Some comments on the usual Rule 144 scenario and related matters
Article Abstract:
The sale of restricted stock by affiliates of the issuer or owners of the stock is complicated by the approvals that must be obtained by the brokerage that is effecting the transfer. Sales of restricted stock can only occur under exemptions or when the securities have been registered. Under Rule 144, the exemption most commonly used, the selling broker will obtain approvals from the brokerage's compliance department as well as requesting from the issuer that stops be lifted. Rule 145(d)(1) and Rule 701 stock transfers are also subject to similar processes.
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Some comments on the reduction in the Rule 144(d) and Rule 144(k) holding periods and on the SEC's proposed changes to Rule 144
Article Abstract:
The SEC made important changes to rules regarding the holding periods of securities in Release No. 33-7390 issued in Feb 1997. Holding periods under Rules 144(d) and (k) were reduced to one and two years, respectively. The retroactivity of the changes has been cause for some confusion and concern. Concern has also arisen over SEC proposals for Rule 144 amendments which include the proposal to discard the manner of sale requirement found in Rule 144(f) and (g). Serious compliance problems could result from the adoption of that proposal.
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: An economic analysis of shared property in partnership and close croporations law. The evolving partnership
- Abstracts: Bylaws, disclosure, appraisal on agenda. Delaware mulls limited partners' claims. Well-pleaded derivative claims survive
- Abstracts: New rules concerning limitations on U.S. tax benefits from operations in restricted countries. Foreign tax credit limitation rules
- Abstracts: The interplay of SEC Rule 145(d) and Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. SEC rule 701: does rule 701 status "flow through" to transferees?
- Abstracts: Some newer cost-containment ideas. Looking beyond changes for opportunities. Whose pension is it anyway?