The AWA case - some further reflections
Article Abstract:
In the 1992 case AWA Ltd v Daniels the judge ruled that auditors were negligent in relation to two audits conducted for the company, but that the auditors could file a contributory negligence claim against the company. The basis for this was his determination that executive directors of the company did not exercise a proper duty of care. The exact division of responsibility between executive and non-executive directors awaits further evaluation.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The battle for law reform in the area of corporate law continues
Article Abstract:
Reform of laws on corporate directors' loans is not necessary. The Australian Securities Commission has sufficient power to punish illegal transactions and recent cases show that directors do get punished. Hawkins v Bank of China imposed a debt liability on a director, and Rema Industries & Services v Coad imposed liability on a director, even though he was not involved in daily management.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Historic statement on the duties of directors
Article Abstract:
An historic judgment of the New South Wales Supreme Court in AWA Ltd v Daniels decided that in certain cases courts will rule on common law duties of care required of company directors. This is important since it opens up the use of contributory negligence as a possible counter-claim on the part of auditors against the directors of the companies in cases involving liability of the auditors.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The Del. Court of Chancery rules on a board's duty to monitor employees; the Legislature amends the state's business laws
- Abstracts: Those mainframes simply don't compute any more. Technology options; law departments stay ahead of law firms. Firms invest in technology to keep an eye on the future
- Abstracts: Lawyers in love ... and in conflict: when do romantic relationships get in the way of representing clients? When bonuses boomerang: rewards for nonlawyer staff, outside lawyers cannot be division of fees
- Abstracts: Who represents financial America. Who represents corporate America; the NLJ client list. Who represents financial America; the NLJ client list
- Abstracts: New law affects the treatment of distributions from retirement plans. Antenuptial agreement didn't waive surviving spouse's right to retirement plan benefit