function confirmModerate(url,num,pid){ url = url + '?Comments[do]=mod&Comments[pid]=' + pid + '&Comments[id]=' + num + '#Comments_' + num; if (confirm('Do you want to report this comment as inappropriate?')) location.href=url; return 0; } function validate_form(frm) { var value = ''; var errFlag = new Array(); _qfMsg = ''; value = frm.elements['Comments[name]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['name']) { errFlag['name'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your name'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[captcha]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['captcha']) { errFlag['captcha'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter Security Code'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[mail]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your e-mail'; } var regex = /^((\"[^\"\f\n\r\t\v\b]+\")|([\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+(\.[\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+)*))@((\[(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))\])|(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))|((([A-Za-z0-9\-])+\.)+[A-Za-z\-]+))$/; if (value != '' &&!regex.test(value) && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - E-mail address format is invalid'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[text]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your comment'; } if (value.length<50 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too short (50 characters min.)'; } if (value.length>4000 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too long (4000 characters max)'; } if (_qfMsg != '') { _qfMsg = 'Invalid information entered:' + _qfMsg + '\nPlease correct these fields.'; alert(_qfMsg); return false; } return true; } //]]>

The Microsoft case: trial court's 'conclusions of law'

Article Abstract:

The author outlines Microsoft's marketing of its Internet Explorer web browser and tells why he thinks it was a violation of antitrust law.

Author: Jackson, Thomas Penfield

Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

The Microsoft case: trial court's 'findings of fact'

Article Abstract:

The author explains why he found that Microsoft Corp. violated antitrust law in the marketing of its Internet Explorer web browser.

Author: Jackson, Thomas Penfield

Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Microsoft Corp., Marketing, Antitrust law, MSFT, Web browsers

Similar abstracts:

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.