The Microsoft case: trial court's 'findings of fact'
Article Abstract:
The author gives the reasoning behind his finding that Microsoft Corp. was trying to establish a monopoly in the marketing of its Windows operating system.
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
Prepackaged software, Software Publishers, Systems Software Pkgs (Micro), Operating systems (Software), Operating systems
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The Microsoft Case: trial court's 'findings of fact'
Article Abstract:
The author tells why he believes Microsoft Corp. violated antitrust laws in the marketing of Internet Explorer, its web browsing software.
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
Interpretation and construction, Antitrust law
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The Microsoft case: trial court's 'conclusions of law'
Article Abstract:
The author explains why he believes that Microsoft Corp. is liable for antitrust violations in its marketing of its web browser.
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
Tying agreements, Tying arrangements
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Subjects list: United States, Computer software industry, Software industry, Laws, regulations and rules, Microsoft Corp., Marketing, MSFT, Monopolies, Web browsers
Similar abstracts:
- Abstracts: Mike's friendly Microsoft takeover; how one lawyer got control of all those M'soft class actions. Microsoft: judge vs. judge; the appellate opinion is a factor at final arguments
- Abstracts: A critical misdiagnosis: how courts underestimate the anticompetitive implications of hospital mergers. Hospitals, mergers, and two-stage competition
- Abstracts: Trials of the century. When cyberstalkers walk. Treading on titans' turf
- Abstracts: Why are some countries so poor? The dead hand of corruption and monopoly. Monopoly and poverty: killing the goose that lays the golden eggs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.