The 'joint work' provision of the Copyright Act could be used by companies to assert authorship of certain works not covered by 'work for hire' arrangements
Article Abstract:
The federal district court decision in Clogston v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons hints at the relationship between the copyright law's 'works made for hire provision,' which states that the creator's employer owns a work, and its 'joint work' provision, which gives ownership to each author who played a part in a work. Dr. Clogston was held to be the owner of the orthopedic textbook at issue under neither provision. The decision implies that the 'works made for hire' provision does not favor the employer, unless employees are acting within the scope of their position.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Courts unclear whether Internet names infringe; a company may find its mark 'borrowed' by Net-surfers
Article Abstract:
Companies should act soon to secure the Internet domain names related to their business and product names, if only to prevent competitors or third parties from doing so. Internet addresses are numerical, but alphanumeric domain names are the more popular method for sending messages. Companies that have already alleged infringement or had to protect their name or mark include Wired magazine, McDonald's, MTV Networks, and Stanley H. Kaplan. Companies should also register similar names or unflattering take-offs.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
In a novel ruling, the 6th Circuit holds that attorneys may be liable in a 'Bivens' action if they've seized goods that allegedly infringe a copyright or trademark
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has ruled in Vector Research, Inc. v. Howard & HOward P.C. that attorneys who obtained a seizure-and-impoundment order in an ex-parte proceeding were federal actors with Bivens liability. THey did not, according to the court, have the qualified immunity defense of government actors but could assert a good-faith defense. The decision was remanded to the trial court for consideration of the Bivens and of the state law claims.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Charitable trust can be used to convey stock in close corp. Planning for possible pretermitted children and pretermitted spouses
- Abstracts: Mediation, arbitration square off; the majority of in-house counsel surveyed prefer mediation to binding arbitration, a significant change from three years ago
- Abstracts: Though fame be narrow, FTDA protection holds; some courts will protect from dilution marks that are known only locally or industrywide
- Abstracts: Constitutional law - Tenth Amendment - Ninth Circuit holds interim enforcement provisions of the Brady Bill constitutional - Mack v. United States, 66 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 1995), petition for cert. filed, 64 U.S.L.W. 3642 (U.S. Mar. 15, 1996)(No. 95-1478)
- Abstracts: Ole Miss and Loyola trailblazer is mourned by faculty, alumni, (Louis Westerfield of University of Mississippi School of Law)