This team hopes to revolutionize politics; lawyer couple's suits over 'fusion' candidates is before the high court
Article Abstract:
Attorney-couple Joel Rogers and Sarah E. Siskind have before the US Supreme Court the case of McKenna v. Twin Cities Area New Party, which will decide whether the First Amendment allows political parties to nominate those whom another political party has already nominated. The Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit had found that Minnesota's fusion ban was an unconstitutional burden on political parties rights to associate and misconception of the goal of the ballot.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Justices consider protests that get rough
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court considered in Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York the issue of when a protest by the pro-life movement before an abortion clinic was too rough. The trial court placed a 15-foot buffer zone around entrances to the clinic. Sidewalk counseling was permitted inside the zone, but if the person being counseled expressed a lack of interest, the counselor was to stop immediately and move back behind the buffer zone.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The Delaware tax trap and the abolition of the rule against perpetuities. Alaska enacts additional estate planning legislation
- Abstracts: New portability for group term life plans. Tax-free benefits for the terminally ill ok'd. Living benefits riders provide access to life insurance proceeds for the terminally ill
- Abstracts: What are ethics? The right thing ... the right way. Quality, not quantity counts
- Abstracts: New wings sprout on high court; conservatives divided by independent streak. The Court confounds observers; newest members pick their own paths
- Abstracts: The waiting at the (patent) bar is over - the Supreme Court decides Hilton Davis. Do the means justify the end - a matter of Bond, Bowles, the office and 35 U.S.C. s. 112, paragraph 6