The use of force against terrorism and international law

Article Abstract:

The United States' actions in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks have been largely without authorization of the United Nations Security Council. The U.S. should seek such authorization for future actions and involve the Security Council directly in planning a war on terrorism. That is the best way to preserve world order and to ensure that the terrorists' goals are not accomplished.

Laws, regulations and rules, Powers and duties, War (International law), United Nations. Security Council

---

In defense of world public order

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the worldwide effects of the September 11 terrorist attacks. He claims that the nations of the world favoring public order have no choice but to fight a war of self-defense until terrorism is defeated.

Protection and preservation, Security, International, International security

---

The incident at Cavalese and strategic compensation

Article Abstract:

The authors examine the NATO Status of Forces Agreement 1951 and its function in a post-Cold War Europe after the incident at Cavalese, Italy, when a U.S. military plane severed a cable-care line and killed 20 people.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Peacekeeping forces

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The private Lachs: life as art. Terrorism and the right of self-defense. Keith Highet (1933-2000)
• Abstracts: Suspicion, or the new Prince. In defense of the Court's legitimacy. Political judgments
• Abstracts: Zschernig v. Miller and the Breard matter. Restitution as a remedy in U.S. courts for violations of international law
• Abstracts: RICO and conspiracy construction: the mischief of the economic model. Client perjury: an ever present, multidimensional problem

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.