The writing of the Constitution and the writing on the wall
Article Abstract:
The assurance that originalism provides in constitutional interpretation that the intent of the Framers is being carried out mindfully is false because of the degree to which constitutional jurisprudence has departed from that intent. Nonoriginalist interpretation is often criticized for its mindlessness, but originalism ultimately suffers the same fate. The Framers' attempt to limit federal powers through the enumerated powers doctrine has failed, and much constitutional doctrine that has replaced that approach is constitutional improvisation and not interpretation.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution
Article Abstract:
The equal protection concerns of the US Constitution support abortion rights arguments better than the privacy-as-a-condition-of-liberty arguments adopted by the Supreme Court and many feminists. Many abortion rights supporters dislike the equality argument because it has been adopted by anti-abortion activists who claim the unborn have a right to equality. In fact, the Constitution does not imply either privacy or equality rights to the unborn. The abortion rights movement should not cede the equality argument because it actually supports their cause.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Interpreting the Constitution: is the Intent of the Framers controlling? If not, what is?
Article Abstract:
Constitutional interpretation can be divided between the schools of original intent and noninterpretivism. The latter emphasizes that we live in a different world from the Framers and should use contemporary social values to inform our constitutional interpretation. Noninterpretevists also find key parts of the Constitution such as the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses too vague to divine an original intent and think this vagueness should be filled in by the judge deciding a case. The noninterpretevists seem to have the upper hand at present.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Children of the Revolution. Iran is on a roll. Iran: Brinkmanship
- Abstracts: The new age of assassination. Assassination and preventive killing. Understanding and strategy
- Abstracts: The Green Party of Canada in political space and the new middle class thesis. 'Obstruction galore': A case study of non-violent resistance against nuclear waste disposal in Germany
- Abstracts: Feminist theory and law. Of Richard Epstein and other radical feminists. Two challenges for feminist thought
- Abstracts: Feminisms and the family. Beyond "having it all."(Feminism, Sexual Distinctions, and the Law)