Society, cure thyself

Article Abstract:

In the United States, health care expenditures have reached $600 billion, over 11 percent of the gross national product, and the costs are increasing. Nonetheless, one in seven Americans has no health insurance. A good national health insurance plan would no doubt provide more equitable coverage, yet such a plan may cost $100 billion. There is no doubt that our society could afford national health insurance, but only if it decides that health care for all Americans is a true priority. National health insurance could lead to indirect savings and, perhaps, a reduction in some liability suits and judgments. Determinations could be made as to what procedures constitute 'good' medical practice; these could be paid for by the national plan. Other 'fancy' procedures may be paid for privately, if they are desired. Some people are likely to insist that this represents a two-tier system, in which the wealthy get better health care. However, such objections will simply prevent a national health plan from being enacted, to no one's benefit. It is also clear that all other social programs cannot simply be dropped to make funds available for universal health care. Society will have to rationally evaluate the priority it places on health care and the kind of health care it is willing and able to pay for. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)

Analysis, Usage, Laws, regulations and rules, Medical care, Health insurance, Medical care, Cost of, Health care costs, National health insurance, editorial

---

The opportunity connection

Article Abstract:

The downward trend in public support of higher education betrays the US commitment to equal opportunity and is detrimental to competitiveness. Affordable public universities give all Americans a chance and ensure that the US has an ample and competent workforce to compete globally.

Social aspects, Finance, Public universities and colleges, State aid to higher education

---

The great overcoat scare

Article Abstract:

A satirical view is presented of how researchers working for trial lawyers often exaggerate the risks that certain products pose to public safety.

Product liability, Humor and anecdotes, Products liability, Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law)

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The great big telescope. Giant dinosaur
• Abstracts: Techstyle. The hunt for the god particle
• Abstracts: A bounty of science. The prospects for homo economicus
• Abstracts: Make science, not war. The climax of humanity. Better killing through chemistry
• Abstracts: NF's cancer connections. Zeroing in on a breast cancer susceptibility gene

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.