Autonomy, adaptation, and rationality - a critical discussion of Jon Elster's concept of "sour grapes"
Article Abstract:
Jon Elster's concept of sour grapes or adaptive preference formation is critically examined and linked to the narrowness of rational choice theory. Sour grapes, according to Elster, is the phenomenon that preferences are shaped by the conditions of the action. For him, it is a causal process and occurs non-consciously as opposed to intentionality. Elster's concept is criticized because it has a narrow view of the causal and the intentional. Moreover, the idea that personality is static emerges from analyzing Elster's ideas on the adaptation of human desires.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Intentional action and pure causality: a critical discussion of some central conceptual distinctions in the work of Jon Elster
Article Abstract:
Human action cannot be properly understood on the basis of the extreme dichotomy between intentionality and pure causality found in Jon Elster's rational choice theory. Elster maintains that only unitary entities, individual human beings, are capable of action, not institutions. Even individuals only act when their actions are intentional, directed toward maximization of utility. Otherwise, actions are determined by purely causal forces operating within the person. However, Elster's conception of human action is inadequate.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Autonomy, adaptation, and rationality - a critical discussion of Jon Elster's concept of "sour grapes."
Article Abstract:
Jon Elster's view that there is a fundamental incompatibility between autonomy and rationality, and adaptation to conditions of an individual's existence in which one's desires or preferences are adjusted to what is possible to achieve was examined. It was shown that Elster's conclusions regarding autonomy and adaptation are premised on a defective idea of human experience and rationality.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The relations of personality and cognitive styles on job and class performance. The effects of Type A behavior dimensions and optimism on coping strategy, health, and performance
- Abstracts: Reducing patient mortality in hospitals: the role of human resource management. Notes from a small island: researching organizational behavior in healthcare from a UK perspective
- Abstracts: Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Organizational behavior in multinational organizations
- Abstracts: A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: using market data to infer utilities. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets
- Abstracts: Speaking of fashion: consumers' uses of fashion discourses and the appropriation of countervailing cultural meanings