Countering cyberhate: more regulation or more speech?
Article Abstract:
US law has yet to define what constitutes a hate speech crime in cyberspace and what is still under the umbrella of freedom of speech. Most of the debate has focused on hate-based Websites that have increased recently, although concern has also been expressed about hate-filled chat room conversations and e-mail messages. The Simon Wiesenthal Center identified 250 new hate sites on the World Wide Web in a report issued in 1997. Those advocating site removal based on content face a difficult task, however. No consistency exists internationally on censorship and free speech protection.
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The language of hate: discrimination complaints are growing as the workplace becomes more bilingual
Article Abstract:
Employment discrimination cases based on English-only policies are increasing as Americans tolerate foreigners less and more foreigners come to the US. Asian and Latin American immigrants made up 84% of those coming to the US between 1981 and 1990. The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Garcia v. Spun Steak that English-only policies are not discriminatory on their face, making it more difficult for employees to prove discrimination. Language policies are linked to other issues such as bilingual education and voting materials.
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Hate crime sentences can now be enhanced under a new federal law
Article Abstract:
The 1994 federal crime bill authorizes the enhancement of criminal sentences for hate crimes. Hate crimes are classified as those motivated by hatred of someone's race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or ethnic group. The law supports the Supreme Court's Wisconsin v. Mitchell decision, which ruled that the state's sentence enhancement law did not violate First Amendment freedom of speech rights. Leaders of target groups are pleased about the law's passage, but know real solutions much come at the local level.
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Predicting employee aggression against coworkers, subordinates and supervisors: the roles of person behaviors and perceived workplace factors
- Abstracts: Contingency in innovation and the role of national systems: taxol and taxotere in the USA and France. Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm
- Abstracts: Computone Corporation: an instructional case in earnings management and revenue recognition. Using case materials to research professional standards on revenue recognition issues
- Abstracts: Gender and education impacts on employment and earnings in West Africa: evidence from Guinea. Are Africans practicing safer sex? Evidence from demographic and health surveys for eight countries
- Abstracts: A case study on developing a technology-based substance abuse education curriculum. An exploration of the effect of on-site 12-step meetings on post-treatment outcomes among polysubstance-dependent outpatient clients