Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: contrast versus assimilation revisited
Article Abstract:
The present research examined the effects of knowledge of a ratee's prior performance on evaluations of present performance. In three separate studies, subjects received knowledge of either good or poor prior performances and then viewed and rated a videotape depicting average performance. In Study 1, some subjects received knowledge of the ratee's prior performance by directly viewing videotapes of good or poor ratee behavior, whereas others only reviewed written performance ratings completed by those subjects who had actually viewed the ratee. A contrast effect occurred when knowledge of prior performance was obtained by observing ratee behavior, but an assimilation effect occurred when knowledge of prior performance was obtained by reviewing performance ratings. In study 2, subjects viewed videotapes of good or poor performances prior to viewing an average performance by the same ratee. However, the separate ratee performances were observed over a more realistic time interval than that used in Study 1 (3 weeks vs. 1 h). No significant contrast effects were observed. In Study 3, subjects reviewed written ratings of prior performances before viewing an average videotape. Subjects who reviewed extremely good (or poor) prior performance ratings provided more extreme ratings of the "average" performance than did subjects who reviewed less extreme ratings. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1988
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
When ratee satisfaction influences performance evaluations: a case of illusory correlation
Article Abstract:
Iaffaldano and Muchinsky's (1985) meta-analysis suggested that the satisfaction-performance relation constitutes an illusory correlation. Two experiments are reported that investigated whether this illusory correlation may systematically bias performance evaluations when ratee satisfaction levels are known. In Experiment 1, students who were told that an instructor was satisfied rated his performance more favorably than students who were told that he was dissatisfied. In Experiment 2, subjects performed an in-basket task and completed a satisfaction questionnaire prior to evaluating a ratee's performance on a similar in-basket task. Subjects appraised a satisfied ratee more favorably than they appraised a dissatisfied ratee. In addition, subjects provided with bogus feedback indicating that their task satisfaction was high evaluated their own performance more favorably than subjects provided with dissatisfaction feedback. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Relationship between job knowledge and the reliability of conceptual similarity schemata
Article Abstract:
Several investigators have argued that raters often rely on the conceptual similarity among performance dimension labels to guide the pattern of their performance ratings. Recent studies have used individual-level conceptual similarity (CS) judgments to investigate this systematic distortion hypothesis and related performance rating issues. In this article the results from 4 studies are reported in which 171 subjects complete CS judgments on 2 occasions. In 3 separate studies the reliability of CS schemata was found to be positively related to the rater's relevant job knowledge. In a 4th study it was found that changes in CS schemata over a 9-week interval may result from CS unreliability as much as from any meaningful reconceptualization of CS structure. Implications for performance rating research are reviewed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: test of three hypotheses. Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance
- Abstracts: Ignoring irrelevant information: situational determinants of consumer learning. The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making
- Abstracts: Perceived performance norm as a mediator in the effect of assigned goal on personal goal and task performance
- Abstracts: Effects of using high- versus low-performing job incumbents as sources of job-analysis information. Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance