Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups

Article Abstract:

Both basic and applied research indicates that women are generally seen as less competent and are less influential in task groups than men. Two studies were conducted, with both female and male speakers, to examine the effectiveness of influence attempts when displaying task cues (behaviors that imply ability or task competence) or dominance cues (attempts to influence or control through threat). Results indicated a significant positive effect of task cues on perceived competence and actual influence, whereas the display of dominance cues was ineffective in gaining status and influence and resulted in negative reactions from others. Furthermore, this pattern held for female and male speakers. These results suggest that the display of task cues is an effective means to enhance one's status in groups and that the attempt to gain influence in task groups through dominance is an ineffective and poorly received strategy for both men and women. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Work groups, Teamwork (Workplace), Social groups, Dominance (Psychology), Task forces

---

Group decision making under stress

Article Abstract:

Understanding the processes by which task groups function is a major concern of social psychologists who study small groups. Equally important to the applied group researcher is the understanding of how group processes are altered by the external environment. Research suggests that organizations respond to stress with a centralization of authority so that decision making becomes concentrated in the higher levels of an organizational hierarchy. In this study, this hypothesis was extended to the small-group level of analysis, and the effects of stress on group status and decision making were examined. Experimental results clarify and delimit the centralization-of-authority hypothesis: Rather than centralizing authority and decision making under stress, group leaders and group members become more receptive to information provided by others. Implications for group decision making are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Stress (Psychology), Decision-making, Group, Group decision making

---

Effects of preparatory information on enhancing performance under stress

Article Abstract:

Research conducted largely in medical and clinical settings suggests that receiving preparatory information prior to a stressful event can reduce negative responses to stress. Although results within this domain have been promising, little research has examined the efficacy of preparatory information on enhancing performance in a more applied task environment. This study examined the effect of preparatory information on reducing stress reactions and enhancing performance on a realistic decision-making task. Results indicated that those who received preparatory information prior to performing under high-stress conditions reported less anxiety, were more confident in their ability to perform the task, and made fewer performance errors than those who received no preparatory information. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Stress management

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: contrast versus assimilation revisited
• Abstracts: Influence of amount of job descriptive information on job analysis rating accuracy. Factors of union commitment: the case for a lower dimensionality
• Abstracts: The experience of work and turnover intentions: interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood
• Abstracts: Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal predictions
• Abstracts: Using the culture concept in an organization development setting. Toward more user-centric OD: Lessons from the field of experience-based design and a case study

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.