The systematic distortion hypothesis, halo, and accuracy: an individual-level analysis
Article Abstract:
In several social perception studies investigators have concluded that raters' semantic conceptual similarity schemata serve to guide and constrain dimensional covariance in the rating judgment process. This effect has been hypothesized to be most likely when ratings are memory based and raters lack relevant job or ratee information. Recent research that has explored the effects of conceptual similarity schemata on performance ratings and halo error has provided some limited support for this systematic distortion hypotheses (SDH). However, these studies are limited because researchers have examined this phenomena using group-level analyses, whereas the theory references individual-level judgment processes. The present study investigated the phenomena at the individual level. The effects of varying levels of rater job knowledge (high, medium, and low) and familiarity with ratees (high and low) were examined for conceptual similarity-rating and rating-true-score covariation relations, for measure of halo, and for rating accuracy components. Result provided support for the SDH, but indicated a boundary condition for its operation and revealed some surprising findings for individual-level rater halo. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1987
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A note on the statistical correction of halo error
Article Abstract:
While many practitioners consider it possible to statistically correct performance evaluations to eliminate the halo effect, this may not be wise. Halo, rather than being simply a numerical anomaly, could actually change the performance of the individual, producing results that are more deeply skewed than might be thought. This would preclude a merely statistical reaction to the problem.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Job knowledge, ratee familiarity, conceptual similarity and halo error: an exploration
Article Abstract:
A study tested the hypothesis called semantic conceptual similarity, as a source for halo distortions in performance evaluations. Using baseball players, the study measured the conceptual similarity that arose when players were given correlation performance factors they did not understand. The results support the hypothesis.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A new meta-analytic approach. Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: an integrative analysis. A new approach for utility analysis
- Abstracts: The nomological validity of the Type A personality among employed adults. Role of social support in the experience of stress at work
- Abstracts: A comparison of attitudes and emotions as predictors of behavior at diverse levels of behavioral experience. A closer look at classical conditioning
- Abstracts: On the relationship between cognitive and affective processes: a critique of Zajonc and Markus. A meta-analysis of effect sizes in consumer behavior experiments
- Abstracts: An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs. A warning about the use of a standard deviation across dimensions within ratees to measure halo