| The Sociological Review |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| Against structure: a critique of morphogenetic social theory. | Sociology and social work | King, Anthony |
| Bigamy: neither love nor marriage, but a threat to the nation? | Sociology and social work | Soothill, Keith, Grover, Chris |
| Death and work in Britain. | Sociology and social work | Tombs, Steve |
| Deserving victims?: sexual status and the social construction of violence. | Sociology and social work | Richardson, Diane, May, Hazel |
| For structure: its reality, properties and powers: a reply to Anthony King.(Sociological Review, vol. 47, 1999) | Sociology and social work | Archer, Margaret S. |
| Herbert Spencer and discrimination: a comment on Offer.(John Offer, Sociological Review, vol. 47, p. 136, 1999) | Sociology and social work | Rowlandson, Paul |
| In defence of the sociological canon: a reply to David Parker. (response to David Parker, The Sociological Review, p. 122, vol. 45, no. 1, 1997) | Sociology and social work | Mouzelis, Nicos |
| Late modernity and the dynamics of quasification: the case of the themed restaurant.(Review) | Sociology and social work | Beardsworth, Alan, Bryman, Alan |
| Occupation, biography and new social movements. | Sociology and social work | Searle-Chatterjee, Mary |
| Telling stories about men. (books about men written by men) | Sociology and social work | Weeks, Jeffrey |
| The appeal to `professionalism' as a disciplinary mechanism. | Sociology and social work | Fournier, Valerie |
| Viewpoint: why bother with Durkheim? Teaching sociology in the 1990s. (Emile Durkheim) | Sociology and social work | Parker, David |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
