Comments on "Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm." (response to article by Wesley M. Cohen and Daniel A. Levinthal, Management Science, vol. 40, p. 227, 1994)
Article Abstract:
The weaknesses of the concept of a firm's 'absorptive capacity' as introduced by Cohen and Levinthal (1994) in their seminal paper, 'Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm' are pointed out. Its proponents define 'absorptive capacity' as the ability of an organization to assess, adopt and take advantage of extramural technological developments, which contributes to its industrial competitiveness. While the concept has merit, Cohen and Levinthal's argument is weakened by its failure to recognize the firm's ability to defend itself against the threat of an external technology as an essential element of absorptive capacity. Their mathematical model examining the incentives of a rational firm to investment in absorptive capacity also contains numerous inconsistencies and shortcomings, thus casting doubts on the validity of their results.
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Industry concentration and allocation of resources to basic research
Article Abstract:
The Schumpeterian school believes that concentrated industry is the optimal way to achieve efficient advancement of research and development. A study of resource allocation by specific kinds of concentrated industries to specific kinds of research and development reveals that for two industries with the same number of companies, a concentrated industry falls as short of its Parato optimal investment in general research as its comparable homogeneous counterpart.
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A homogeneous industry model of resource allocation to basic research and its policy implications
Article Abstract:
Various factors related to an industry's division and allocation of resources for the area of general research are explored. The in-depth numerical example can used to certify and to interpret the model according to realistic criteria. The research supports the belief that industry allocations made to fundamental research is suboptimal even when companies are allowed to continue with basic research together though voluntarily.
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Lowe's prepares national TV campaign. Coke and Pepsi escalate their water fight
- Abstracts: Getting IT--the organisational dynamic of the dot.com. Crossing the Great Divide: integrating knowledge management and organisational learning
- Abstracts: Evidence on the relationships between earnings and various measures of cash flow. The incremental information content of accrual versus cash flows
- Abstracts: South Central Bell and the Treadway Commission report. Executive summary: The Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (the Treadway Commission)
- Abstracts: Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: implications for transaction cost theory. Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: a contingency framework