Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation
Article Abstract:
A survey of the 71 manufacturing firms selected by Business Week magazine to comprise Standard and Poor's COMPUSTAT group indicates that: when top executives are employed by externally controlled firms, their salary levels reflect performance but not operation size; and executives who work for stockholder-controlled corporations receive salaries commensurate with operation size that seldom reflect performance levels. These observations are reflected not only in salary levels achieved, but also in rates of salary increases over specified study periods. Perhaps the stockholder-controlled companies pay executives based upon size of firm (or size of operation), because stockholders normally view their firms as investments.
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 1987
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Managerial compensation and firm performance: a general research framework
Article Abstract:
A tremendous amount of research has explored the relationship between managerial pay and firm performance. We argue that this research has generally been limited because it ignores other criteria that can be used to determine managerial pay, as well as the influence of a firm's governance structure and various contingencies. Our analysis leads to a general framework for research on executive pay. This framework is used to evaluate the present state of research in this field and the contribution of the six papers in this special research forum, and to identify directions for further research. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation
Article Abstract:
Using panel data on large, publicly traded U.K. companies gathered between 1991 and 1994, we examined the role of board control and remuneration committees in determining management compensation. Board monitoring, measured in terms of the proportion of nonexecutive directors on a board and the presence of remuneration committees and CEO duality, had only a limited effect on the level of top management pay. An important conclusion was that top management pay and corporate performance are more aligned in companies with outsider-dominated boards and remuneration committees. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Contextual analysis of performance impacts of outcome-based incentive compensation. Applying process knowledge for yield variation reduction: a longitudinal field study
- Abstracts: The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The informational advantages of discretionary bonus schemes
- Abstracts: Peter Clemenger, gentleman and fierce competitor, goes out on a high note. Agency finds it's lonely in the middle
- Abstracts: Headhunters sit this one out. Head-to-head as executive searchers choose a future. Got the chop? Don't do your block. Start to take stock
- Abstracts: An empirical analysis of a skill-based pay program and plant performance outcomes. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects