All's quiet on the Washington front; Federal OSHA is at a standstill, but keep your eye on North Carolina
Article Abstract:
North Carolina is one of the 23 states implementing its own Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) program under the supervision of federal OSHA. However, a fire at Imperial Inc's poultry processing plant in Hamlet, NC, which resulted in the death of 25 emloyees raised questions regarding the efficiency of North Carolina's OSHA program. An assessment of the state program by federal OSHA led to the discovery of certain flaws, prompting the agency to reinstate federal enforcement and initiate formal legal procedures that might lead to a withdrawal of the state plan's approval.
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Court favors huge OSHA penalties
Article Abstract:
The Court has upheld the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA)'s policy of imposing large fines for each violation of its employee safety and health regulations. Administrative law judge D. Burroughs ruled in favor of OSHA's citations when he found the Interstate Lead Co guilty of wilfully violating lead standards and consequently posing health hazards to employees and the public. He believed that stiffer fines will discourage noncompliance of OSHA policies and prevent employers from benefitting from such violations.
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
This is no half-baked ergonomics case: decision gives OSHA direction for future ergonomis cases
Article Abstract:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will long remember its prosecution of the Pepperidge Farms for the valuable lessons it taught in the conduct of ergonomics cases. OSHA was able to win valuable ground when an administrative judge ruled that Pepperidge Farms violated record-keeping and lifting rules. However, the court did reduce the penalty for Pepperidge, because since the OSHA was unable to prove that the company did not institute changes in procedures to ameliorate the safety and health hazards.
Publication Name: Safety & Health
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0891-1797
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The abbreviation squeeze: the proliferation of medical shorthand is a strain on health professionals and a risk to patients
- Abstracts: Anticardiolipin antibodies and the risk for ischemic stroke and venous thrombosis. Age-specific incidence rates of venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden mutation
- Abstracts: Has OSHA passed all the easy standards? OSHA reform