Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians
Article Abstract:
Guidelines for practicing medicine recently have begun to focus on the quality and appropriateness of care given rather than on cost control. Guidelines recommending decreases in the use of cesarean section were distributed to obstetricians in Ontario. To determine the effectiveness of these guidelines, hospitals and private practices were surveyed before and two years after guidelines were issued. The study found that a majority of the physicians were informed of the guidelines and agreed with the content. One third of the physicians and hospitals claimed to follow guideline recommendations and had changed practice accordingly, and obstetricians generally reported that the rate of performing cesarean section on women who had previously had a cesarean was reduced. However, the cesarean section rates, measured after guideline distribution, were actually higher than reported by physicians. When the physicians were asked about guideline content, there was a only a 67 percent correct answer rate. It was concluded that physicians were not moving closer to the recommendations stated in the guidelines. It is suggested that incentives to change should be implemented and incentives not to change should be eliminated. It appears that although the guidelines affect physician perceptions, in practice there is little evidence of changed behavior in response to the guidelines.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Controlling health expenditures - the Canadian reality
Article Abstract:
The costs of health care, and who is going to pay them, are of great concern to both Canada and the United States. To date, market forces and legislative policies regarding health insurance have failed to restrain the growth of health care expenditures in the United State. Canada, on the other hand, has developed a system with a radically different approach to providing reimbursement for health care that avoids or solves a number of the problems facing the US. The Canadian system allocates a proportion of the national income to cover general health expenditures, and citizens there are universally covered without being charged. Consequently, problems of uncompensated care, the explosive costs of catastrophic illness, and uninsured individuals are avoided. American observers question Canada's ability to sustain such a policy. Canadian and American expenditure data is compared, and those areas where the two systems diverge the most are analyzed. In general, Canada has opted to rely on political processes to resolve the natural conflict between the health care providers and those who must pay for it, while the US has permitted market forces to play that role. The Canadian approach may be less intrusive on the professional autonomy of the physician than the American system.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Hospital care for elderly patients with diseases of the circulatory system; a comparison of hospital use in the United States and Canada
Article Abstract:
There has been considerable interest in comparing the costs and services of the medical systems in the US and Canada, because the organization of hospital treatment and the availability of physicians is very similar. Despite these and other similarities the two countries have experienced very different financial trends in health care since the 1960s. From a period in which both countries spent approximately the same percentage of their gross national product (GNP) on health care, costs in the US escalated to 11.2 percent of GNP in 1987 while in Canada health costs comprised 8.6 percent of the GNP. Analysis has shown that patients are discharged sooner in the US as compared with patients in Canada, a trend that may have been produced by the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), a system for cost-containment initiated by the medical insurance sector in the US. The rate of spending on elderly Canadians is less than similar spending in the US; the discrepancy is due in part to the greater use of coronary artery bypass surgery and expensive new imaging technologies (e.g., CAT scanning, MRI) in the US. No attempt was made to examine whether differences in spending resulted in different outcomes for the patients.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A developmental view of the effects of an energy and micronutrient supplement on undernourished children in Indonesia
- Abstracts: The effect of an organisational model on the standard of care. Nurses win 100m pounds sterling to fund ongoing training needs
- Abstracts: Covering the uninsured; interactions among public and private sector strategies. Including the poor: the fiscal impacts of medicaid expansion
- Abstracts: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prednisone for dilated cardiomyopathy. Promotion and subsequent inhibition of plasminogen activation after administration of intravenous endotoxin to normal subjects
- Abstracts: Knowledge of HIV antibody status and decisions to continue or terminate pregnancy among intravenous drug users. part 2