Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
Article Abstract:
Inadequate concealment of patient treatment allocation during randomized, controlled trials appears to lead to unreliable results. Randomized, controlled trials are used to evaluate drug therapy or other treatments. Thirty-three meta-analyses of the design of 250 controlled trials were analyzed. In 79 trials researchers judged that adequate steps were taken to conceal treatment allocation from participants. In 21 trials, inadequate steps were taken and in 150 trials researchers were unable to determine if steps to conceal treatment allocation were adequate. Significantly larger estimates of treatment effects occurred in trials in which concealment was unclear or inadequate than in trials judged to have provided adequate concealment. When evaluating studies, researchers should carefully assess whether biases in comparison groups exist.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
Article Abstract:
An adapted Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for reporting noninferiority and equivalence trials is presented and illustrative examples and explanations for those items amended from the original CONSORT checklist are provided. The intent is to improve reporting of noninferiority and equivalence trials, enabling readers to assess the validity of their results and conclusions.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2006
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published trials
Article Abstract:
An attempt is made to examine the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a cohort of randomized trials. The conclusion states that the reporting of trial outcomes is biased and inconsistent with protocols.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Efficacy and safety of indomethacin compared with magnesium sulfate in the management of preterm labor: a randomized study
- Abstracts: Atypical X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency due to possible spontaneous reversion of the genetic defect in T cells
- Abstracts: Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer. Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes
- Abstracts: Acute illnesses associated with pesticide exposure at schools. Brief report: exposure to tear gas from a theft- deterrent device on a safe- Wiscconsin, December 2003
- Abstracts: Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth weight. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection