The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation
Article Abstract:
The quality of many review articles in the medical literature may be low. Researchers evaluated the quality and conclusions of 51 review articles on the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for low-back pain. They scored the reviews on 14 measures of quality including whether the review evaluated randomized clinical trials only and whether the authors used statistical pooling. Thirty-four reviews concluded that spinal manipulation was effective and 17 were neutral or inconclusive. However, the overall quality of the reviews was poor, with a median score of 23 out of 100. Only three reviews scored higher than 50. In 40% of the reviews, a practitioner of spinal manipulation was one of the authors. Twenty-two percent of the reviews included non-randomized clinical trials. Many of the reviewers had not retrieved all of the pertinent studies on spinal manipulation.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Lumbar supports for prevention of low back pain in the workplace
Article Abstract:
More rigorous research is needed to determine whether back supports will reduce the risk of low back pain. These supports are made of soft materials often reinforced by plastic or metal and are worn around the abdomen and back. Several randomized controlled trials have shown no benefit from these supports but fewer than half the people studied wore the support on a regular basis. The trials had other design flaws that may invalidate the results. Better trials are needed because low back pain affects 15% to 20% of the US population each year and results in billions of dollars in health care costs.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Lumbar supports and education for the prevention of low back pain in industry: a randomized controlled trial
Article Abstract:
Lumbar supports and advice on proper lifting and other techniques do not appear to reduce the risk of low back pain among manual laborers. Researchers randomly assigned 282 members of the cargo department of an airline to one of four groups: education and lumbar support, education only, lumbar support only or neither. Six months later, the incidence of low back pain was no different in the groups nor did the amount of sick leave taken differ. Those who already had low back pain and received lumbar supports had fewer days with back pain.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The relationship between perinatal cosmetic talc usage and ovarian talc particle burden. Perineal application of talc and cornstarch powders: evaluation of ovarian cancer risk
- Abstracts: Relationship between feeding pattern and body mass index in 220 free-living people in four age groups. High and low fat consumers, their macronutrient intake and body mass index: further analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of British Adults
- Abstracts: The association between maternal cocaine use and placenta previa. Does station of the fetal head at epidural placement affect the position of the fetal vertex at delivery?
- Abstracts: Interpretation of indeterminate HIV serology results in an incarcerated population. Misdiagnosis of HIV Infection by HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load Testing: A Case Series
- Abstracts: Diet in relation to socioeconomic status in patients with coronary heart disease. Concordance of diet with the recommended cholesterol lowering diet in patients with coronary heart disease