Boost productivity with employee contests
Article Abstract:
Financial incentive programs are discussed as an effective way to increase production, while satisfying employees' needs for recognition and better compensation. When pay is linked to individual performance, employee morale and motivation are generally high and employee turnover is lower than average. Advantages and disadvantages to employee bonus programs based on productivity are examined. Among the disadvantages to such incentive programs are: (1) such programs fail to differentiate people and their positions, (2) often, companies cannot afford to make the incentives worth the extra effort of achieving them, (3) average employees may leave the company, unless they can also be rewarded as are the above-average achievers, (4) pay differences can cause co-worker conflicts, and (5) union leaders may be unwilling to negotiate incentive pay plans.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A guide to more productive team incentive programs
Article Abstract:
For a company to increase productivity, and to sustain such increases, a proper reward plan must be implemented, and while in the past a simple sales commission might have been the answer, today's interdependent organizations need group rewards. The options discussed include: profit sharing; and Scanlon, Rucker, and Improshare plans. The Scanlon system is the most common, but it can develop disincentives as its three to five year base period makes it difficult to sustain high bonuses. Management must modify these old compensation systems systems to create new ones that are both productive and sustainable.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The Team that Works Together Earns Together
Article Abstract:
Group Incentive Plans (GIP) are beginning to be accepted as a viable alternative to individual Merit Pay Programs (MPPs). GIPs may be divided into three general types: profit sharing, group goal attainment and production improvement. In general GIPs can offer greater incentives to employees as they are more closely tied to productivity than are MPPs. It is possible to combine the two incentive methods to suit the style of the individual company. The GIP is worth considering as a positive link to increased productivity.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1984
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: New taskforce to advise on employment tribunals. Safety no defence for rejecting pregnant woman. Arrangements not indirectly discriminatory
- Abstracts: Netherlands: pay growth slows. Working Time Act: five years on. Non-managerial profit-sharing schemes in the Netherlands
- Abstracts: Expatriate policies and practices examined: international. Where governance meets technology
- Abstracts: Supervisor's Guide to a Preventive Maintenance Program. Money-Saving Ideas for the Profit-Minded Supervisor. Transition to a New Supervisor
- Abstracts: How to Have Effective Meetings. Giving Orders: Your Stock in Trade. The Value of Studying Each Employee