Firm agrees to record S & L settlement; shifting standards require lawyers to disclose more to regulatory agencies
Article Abstract:
Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue's $51 million settlement with the Office of Thrift Supervision on claims the firm helped Charles Keating perpetrate the fraud leading to the collapse of Lincoln Savings and Loan Assn will make lawyers more concerned about client behavior in the future. Lawyers who represent clients before regulators, in particular, will feel greater pressure to disclose client improprieties. The Jones, Day settlement denies wrongdoing by the firm while at the same time absolving it of any present or future liability to the Resolution Trust Corp regarding the Lincoln debacle.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
ABA settles antitrust suit on accreditation: Justice Department says review process inflated law school faculty salaries
Article Abstract:
The American Bar Association on June 27 announced an agreement with the Justice Dept settling charges by the latter that it abused its powers as a law-school accrediting agency. The accusations, similar to those raised by the Massachusetts School of Law in Nov 1993, accuse the ABA of using its accrediting process to artificially inflate law teachers' salaries and require other costly expenditures not directly related to legal education. The ABA denied the charges' validity, and said it had already made the changes requested.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Rare sanction against firm, client: judge enters default judgment, says ABC and Wilmer, Cutler suppressed facts
Article Abstract:
Federal judge Royce C. Lamberth in a ruling issued on Apr 15, 1992 ended a race discrimination suit filed by former employees against ABC and its parent company, Capital Cities Inc, with a default judgment, accusing both ABC and its law firm, Wilmer, Cutler and Pickering, of trying to suppress important information during the discovery phase. Wilmer, Cutler plans to submit a detailed rebuttal to the court in May.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Terms of embitterment. (Pres. Bill Clinton an example of how lawyers are too cute with language). The In Crowd
- Abstracts: Photos to go - hold the film; digital cameras developing as easy way to snap, snore and send pictures. Focus on function; with 'production areas' instead of offices, this firm has no room for ego
- Abstracts: Alien-criminals sent packing: immigration lawyers face new woes with tough deportation law
- Abstracts: Function over form: a reassessment of standards of review in Delaware corporation law. Overview of standards of review
- Abstracts: Just why did Jones Day settle? In Lincoln S & L case. Jones Day: behind the settlement; what can law firms learn from the Jones Day/RTC pact?