Is god a preferred creditor? Tithing as an avoidable transfer in Chapter 7 bankruptcies
Article Abstract:
Passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993 served to resolve the conflict on the question of whether tithes are subject to avoidance by creditors as fraudulent conveyances under section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code. First Amendment and adequate consideration arguments were less successful in protecting religious contributions made by bankruptcy debtors. Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, it appears that creditors would have to overcome the compelling interest and least restrictive means tests for abridging religious freedoms to undo such conveyances.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Tithing in chapter 13 - a divine creditor exception to section 1325?
Article Abstract:
Bankruptcy courts cannot exempt tithes from the repayment standards of section 1325 of the Bankruptcy Code because to do so would violate the Establishment Clause. It has been argued that allowing debtors to exempt tithes vindicates rights under the Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but even under the Act's heightened scrutiny, bankruptcy courts are justified in not exempting tithes. To accommodate tithing would violate the Establishment Clause because the government would be favoring those religions that require adherents to tithe.
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Now you see it, now you don't: the impact of RFRA's invalidation on religious tithes in bankruptcy
Article Abstract:
The 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) inappropriately provided debtors who made religious donations with an exemption from fraudulent conveyance laws. The RFRA was enacted in response to the 1990 US Supreme Court decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith, which would not allow First Amendment considerations to impede fraudulent conveyance procedures. The US 8th Circuit Court of Appeals supported the RFRA but the act was invalidated by the 1997 US Supreme Court decision in City of Boerne v. Flores.
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Dispute resolution and avoidance techniques in the construction industry. Construction dispute prevention comes of age
- Abstracts: Extraterritoriality of human rights treaties. Crimes and accountability in Shakespeare
- Abstracts: Canadian labor policy as a model for legislative reform in the United States. The form and frequency of union mergers
- Abstracts: In the long run: competing in Rocky Mountain ultramarathons keeps this lawyer on the go. Just say 'om;' harried lawyers still their minds with yoga and meditation
- Abstracts: The nonpecuniary costs of accidents: pain-and-suffering damages in tort law. Latent harms and risk-based damages