Criminal defense lawyers and the search for truth
Article Abstract:
The balance of the criminal justice system is being destroyed by attacks on the independence of defense counsel. The position of defense is being demonized by false views of the legal system. Elements of the mythology include the idea that defense attorneys have a license to lie to get their clients off, that publicly appointed defenders are independent and have plentiful resources, that defendants are able to go free by fooling juries, that defense attorneys use exclusionary rules to get acquittals for guilty clients, that appeals are easily won on the basis of technicalities, and that defendants receive minimal sentences and are soon out on parole.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Criminal procedure: moving from the accused as victim to the accused as responsible party
Article Abstract:
The criminal justice system should be reoriented toward a view of the accused as a responsible person rather than as a victim. This would require reforming the ethics of defense counsel as well as eliminating many current procedural rules. The rules in question, created by the Supreme Court during the 1960s, tend to frustrate the criminal justice system's ability to ascertain the truth. Truth-defeating rules such as the exclusionary rule are based on a view of the accused as a victim of social oppression in the form of racism, economic inequality or abuse by the police.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Colorado's Amendment 2: a result in search of a reason
Article Abstract:
Colorado's Amendment 2 was struck down in three different courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court in Romer v. Evans, but the rationale for invalidation was different in each court. The judges were apparently willing to go beyond precedent to reach a desired result. Amendment 2 would have barred any legal protection or special status on the basis of homosexuality or sexual orientation. Implications of the Romer decision for political structure, as well as for the legal treatment of homosexuality and same-sex marriages, are also discussed.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Real defense cuts - and the real defense issues. Commission warns U.S. space assets vulnerable. Clinton revises computer export control regulations
- Abstracts: Post-traditional civil society and the radical center. Civil society; the space that matters most. Consumer society is the enemy
- Abstracts: Armenia's new autocrats. Hunger and the global agenda: who wins, who loses, who cares? Shame and gloom as everyone loses in Armenia
- Abstracts: Nature, development and national identity: the battle over sustainable forestry in Latvia. World summit on sustainable development Johannesburg 2002: A critical analysis and assessment outcomes
- Abstracts: The paradoxes of environmental policy in Eastern Europe: the dynamics of policy-making in the Czech Republic. Environmental security: the case of the Kursk