Deciding on access and levels of care: a comparison of Canada, Britain, Germany, and the United States
Article Abstract:
The US policy environment shaping the effort to curtail health care costs differs fundamentally from the policy environments of Canada, Germany and the UK. Americans typically believe that universal medical coverage will be genuine only if a minimum level of benefits is guaranteed. In contrast, the three other countries limit costs and enforce universal coverage plans through institutional policies that emphasize the structure of medical care. The American attitude probably accounts for why a major reworking of the medical care system is generally ruled out in the US.
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Hope in federalism? What can the states do and what are they likely to do?
Article Abstract:
States will probably proceed cautiously in enacting health care reforms, following the failure of reform at the national level. Insurance reforms and managed care programs for Medicaid recipients are the reforms most likely to be adopted by the states. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) does not present as much of an obstacle to state action as many state officials maintain. Medicaid spending remains one of the biggest and most rapidly growing state budgetary problems, a fact which should motivate reform at the state level.
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Challenges in the provision of care for the chronically ill
Article Abstract:
Providing adequate medical care and social services to the chronically ill has yet to be achieved satisfactorily in Western countries. The chronically ill include the disabled, the frail elderly and those suffering from chronic mental illness. These groups require not only continuing medical care but also support services needing the cooperation of multidisciplinary professionals. An evaluation of the UK, US and German health care systems shows that all three fall far short of maintaining acceptable levels of care for the chronically ill.
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: EU accession and legal change: accomplishments and challenges in the Czech case. Environmental implications of eastern enlargement: the end of progressive EU environmental policy?
- Abstracts: The scope of government and the wealth of nations. Note issue by banks: a step toward free banking in the United States?
- Abstracts: Administering family leave benefits and new challenges for public personnel management: the New York State experience
- Abstracts: The art of place. Germany's heart: the modern taboo
- Abstracts: The CFE Treaty: in retrospect and under review. Article VI activities of Britain, France and China. Pentagon wants to stay lonely at the top