Cognitive processes in self-report responses: tests of item context effects in work attitude measures
Article Abstract:
Much applied research relies on multi-item, self-report instruments. Drawing from recent cognitive theories, it was hypothesized that the items preceding a self-report item, its item context, can generate cognitive carryover and prompt context-consistent reponses. These hypotheses were tested in 2 investigations: a field experiment involving 431 employees of a nonprofit urban hospital and a laboratory replication involving 245 undergraduate business students who held full- or part-time jobs. In both studies, evaluatively neutral items were placed in specially arranged blocks of uniformly positive, uniformly negative, or randomly mixed items on 3 modified Job Descriptive Index scales. Responses to the neutral items differed across the 3 forms, but scale-level psychometric properties remained unchanged. The implications of these item- and scale-level results for a variety of self-report measures in organizations are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
An analysis and evaluation of test and item bias in the prediction context
Article Abstract:
The notion of test and item bias in performance predictions must be put in perspective. Some kinds of bias can be easily corrected for in test procedures. Others, however, cannot be eliminated and the goal of producing a test totally free of bias is unreasonable. The root problem is the labeling of test differences as biases; it is an unfortunate choice of words.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Confidence intervals for the cross-validated multiple correlation in predictive regression models
Article Abstract:
A number of new formulas for estimating the predictive power of a regression model can take the place of empirical cross-validation methodologies in areas of psychological research. Handling specific problems of the analytic tools are discussed. The central concern is the accuracy of approximations of confidence intervals.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: using market data to infer utilities. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets
- Abstracts: Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract
- Abstracts: Principles and practices of design innovation. Components of science-based innovation measurements and their links to public policies
- Abstracts: Predicting employee aggression against coworkers, subordinates and supervisors: the roles of person behaviors and perceived workplace factors
- Abstracts: Organizational processes to meet new performance criteria: Chinese pharmaceutical firms in transition. Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context