The origins of naming: a critique of self-listening
Article Abstract:
Horne and Lowe's account on naming is to be commended for its ability to make the language-development literature more understandable to behavior analysts. They improve experimental analysis of verbal behavior by relating the complex behaviors involved in verbal behavior, stimulus equivalence and rule governance. A major shortcoming of their paper, however, is its emphasis on the role of self-listening in the development of naming and the bidirectional stimulus relations in verbal behavior. Self-listening cannot be experimentally controlled.
Publication Name: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-5002
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Separate repertoires or naming?
Article Abstract:
Horne and Lowe examined equivalence research in terms of listener behavior, the tact relation, echoic and self-echoic behavior, and conditioned perceptual effects. Their account is a logical and acceptable alternative to Sidman's investigation of equivalence as an elementary behavioral process and Hayes and Hayes' contextualist-Kantorian language. However, their higher order unit is not as precise as an analysis in terms of the repertoires that are supposed to make up the higher unit.
Publication Name: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-5002
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Fluctuations in state implicit self-esteem in response to daily negative events. Overconfidence as dissonance reduction
- Abstracts: Predicting onset of drinking in a community sample of adolescents: the role of expectancy and temperament. Onset of major depression during treatment for nicotine dependence
- Abstracts: On the experimental analysis of naming and the formation of stimulus classes. The evolution of naming - just so!
- Abstracts: Experimental analysis of naming behavior cannot explain naming capacity. Natural contingencies in the creation of naming as a higher order behavior class
- Abstracts: Naming as a technical term: sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Can the naming hypothesis be falsified?