Fetal tissue wrangle

Article Abstract:

The recent extension of the ban on the use of fetal tissues for federally funded scientific research was not unexpected, but still remains troublesome. Dr. Louis Sullivan, the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, has demonstrated his authority over the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which appears to be largely influenced by political considerations. The primary issue underlying the decision to ban research using fetal tissue is abortion. The anti-abortionist lobby has threatened to withdraw electoral support from any political figure who does not conform to their demands. Therefore, this research has merely become a casualty of the abortion controversy and has been blocked because of politicians' desires for popularity. In a similar issue, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher refused to let public funds be used to support a study on sexual behavior. The results of the study would have been helpful in preventing the spread of AIDS. Apparently, politicians fear that the inquiry into a subject implies approval of whatever is described or observed. However, a positive example was set by the British Department of Health and Medical Research Council, which published guidelines on the regulation of fetal tissue research. This proposal set a good precedent and outlined ethical guidelines to be adhered to prior to approval of specific studies. The net effect of the continued moratorium in this country is that much valuable research and many long-term studies will not be possible and that the financial burden will be shifted entirely onto the private sector. Perhaps most damaging is the fact that this action may indicate a compromise in the intellectual independence of the NIH which could ultimately lead to a loss of credibility for this organization.

Science and technology policy, Ethical aspects, Medical research, Abortion, Fetal tissues, Medicine, Experimental, editorial, Sullivan, Louis W.

---

NIH agrees to temporary by-pass of AIDS office in allocation of grants

Article Abstract:

Controversy surrounds the temporary transfer of budgetary responsibilities from the Office of AIDS Research (OAR) to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH officials say that the decision was taken to get its funding back on track. Although the House-approved bill states that AIDS research funds should be controlled by NIH, Pres Clinton maintains that the OAR will retain its budgetary responsibilities. It is also pointed out that by-passing the OAR contravenes a 1993 legislation. The fears of AIDS activists regarding the by-passing of OAR are also discussed.

AIDS (Disease), AIDS research

---

First Bush budget set to favour life sciences

Article Abstract:

The US National Institute of Health is set for a 15% increase in spending under budget proposals put forward by President George W. Bush in his term in office.

United States, Life sciences

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Some ethical issues raised by studies of predation and aggression. Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation
• Abstracts: Potential impact of global climate change on species richness of long-distance migrants. The magnitude of local host specificity for phytophagous insects and its implications for estimates of global species richness
• Abstracts: Relating geomorphic change and grazing to avian communities in Riparian forests. Prescribing food regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers
• Abstracts: Pumping of nutrients to ocean surface waters by the action of propagating planetary waves. Decreasing overflow from the Nordic seas into the Atlantic Ocean through the Faroe Bank channel since 1950
• Abstracts: Asymmetric synthesis by enantiomer-selective activation of racemic catalysts. Enzymes for chemical synthesis

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.