Affective, normative and continuance commitment: can the 'right kind' of commitment be managed?
Article Abstract:
This study examines the multi-dimensionality of organizational commitment: affective, normative and continuance (including the sub-components of low perceived alternatives and high personal sacrifice), and how these are differentially related to a set of antecedents and consequences (i.e. turnover intentions, absenteeism and acceptance of change). The results, based on a sample of 505 Australian male fire-fighters, indicate that organizational commitment is best represented by the four-factors of affective, normative, low perceived alternatives and high personal sacrifice. In addition, employees experience different personal, job-related and environmental causes of commitment depending on whether they feel they want to, ought to, or need to remain with the organization. Further, not all facets of commitment enhanced organizational effectiveness, with affective being the most beneficial (i.e. employees are less likely to leave, be absent and are more accepting of change) and low perceived alternatives being the most detrimental (i.e. less accepting of change). The implications of these findings for the management of desirable forms of commitment are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Employee shareholders or institutional investors? When corporate managers replace their stockholders
Article Abstract:
During the past decade, the shares of publicly traded companies moved increasingly into the hands of institutional investors. As large investors pressed companies to restructure, companies were observed in turn to restructure their shareholder base. Drawing on a 1989 survey of 761 US publicly traded companies, firms facing a hostile takeover environment or with large institutional holdings are found to seek greater employee stockholding. Large firms and those that had adopted takeover defenses are more likely when threatened with takeovers or short-term pressures to seek more employee and less institutional stockholding. Though managers are employed by owners, investor efforts to discipline their managers can lead the latter to replace the former. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Emotional exhaustion and organizational deviance: can the right job and a leader's style make a difference? Is organizational democracy worth the effort?
- Abstracts: Product hierarchy and brand strategy influences on the order of entry effect for consumer packaged goods. Predictors of the Survival of Innovations
- Abstracts: Rental contracts: know property and casualty risks. How to choose the right disability coverage. Are any of your properties or contents underinsured?
- Abstracts: Information technology and accelerated science: the case of the Pentium flaw. Building a world-class alliance: The Universal Card - TSYS case
- Abstracts: Global executive: Intel's Andrew Grove on competitiveness. Middle East competitiveness in the 21st century's global market