Equal employment requirements for employers: a closer review of the effects of the Civil Rights Act of 1991
Article Abstract:
The goal of the Civil Rights Act of 1981 was to redress inequities created by several Rehnquist Court decisions during the court's 1989 term, but the act was watered down somewhat as a result of compromise with the Bush administration. The act still imposes on employers a higher burden of proof to defend practices resulting in 'disparate impact.' Employers will want to protect themselves by developing more formalized personnel practices and reviewing those in existence to make sure they have no discriminatory criteria and that job requirements are clearly job-related.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Affirmative action in the public sector: the increasing burden of "strict scrutiny."
Article Abstract:
Many state legislatures have affirmative action restrictions pending, but such restrictions come mainly from the courts, who are finding that some programs have continued after their goals were met or have been justified by reasons not having a compelling governmental interest. It is not surprising that many affirmative action programs for state and local employees have become institutionalized with over 30 years of operation. Risks such as reverse discrimination suits or one ethnic minority suing another endanger the public sector if these programs are not audited.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena: new standards governing the permissibility of federal contract set-asides and affirmative action
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc v. Pena will not impact states or local government's affirmative action programs but expands the existing equal protection standards to the federal government. Federal contract set-asides and affirmative action programs will now have to meet the two-part test involving compelling government interest and the absence of race-neutral alternative remedies. Private programs are also unaffected.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Man with a mission; reviled, revered for his Simpson victory, Johnnie Cochran returns to his roots - civil rights cases
- Abstracts: No flood of ADA suits - yet. A quiet birthday: after a year, little action under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Abstracts: Is big brother watching? Perceptions and research on the effectiveness of the EEOC. Religion in the workplace: specific accommodations for scheduling and personal appearance
- Abstracts: The AWA case - some further reflections. The battle for law reform in the area of corporate law continues. Historic statement on the duties of directors
- Abstracts: Judicial vacancies declining: Clinton nominees nonideological, noncontroversial, to the dismay of some liberals