How the proxy rules discourage constructive engagement: regulatory barriers to electing a minority of directors
Article Abstract:
The SEC should change its rules on proxy contests to allow expert minority board representation. Minority representation would be a nonconfrontational way for shareholders to monitor corporate directors. However, SEC Rule 14a-4(d) prevents minority representation by enforcing the bona fide nominee regulation which forbids a party from seeking a proxy for director candidates unless the candidates expressly concur with the use of their names. Narrowing the rule to permit a candidate's name to be included on the proxy card of any soliciting party would allow minority representation.
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Disclosure, not censorship: the case for proxy reform
Article Abstract:
The SEC's 1991 proposal to relax the rules that encourage passivity among shareholders is entirely commendable. These rules inhibit discussion among shareholders prior to electing corporate directors and prevent financial institutions from offering voting advice. The SEC's proposed changes are: to do away with preclearance for all solicitation materials except the initial proxy statement and proxy card; to permit the use of preliminary proxy statements without a proxy card; and to permit disinterested parties such as financial institutions to counsel the shareholders.
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Proxy reform as a single norm? Evidence related to cross-sectional variation in corporate governance
Article Abstract:
Broad-based proxy reform is unlikely to improve US corporate governance because the need for such reform will not be the same for all industries. The growing proxy reform movement seeks to change the rules governing the relations between corporate managers and shareholders. However, allowing market forces to determine to what extent companies adopt proxy reform is preferable to enacting legislation that requires all companies to change in the same way.
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Guidance systems in place; bar associations hiring management pros to point solos in the right direction. Is it worthless to go wireless? Cell phones offer mobility, but some prefer good old land lines
- Abstracts: Lien-ing on lawyers; decision could affect contingency agreements following attorney bankruptcies. Viva la difference; lawyering in a foreign country calls for a broader view and lots of patience
- Abstracts: Parallel district court and ITC patent infringement actions and PTO interferences. A critique of recent opinions in patent interferences
- Abstracts: Smoke gets in your high-rise; tobacco-sensitive tenants increasingly sue over neighbors' nicotine habits. Brainstorming for reform; Commission entertains ideas on changing multijurisdictional practice
- Abstracts: Duty of disclosure for corporate officers and directors under ERISA. U.S. Supreme Court overrules Seventh Circuit; holds that HMO "treatment" decisions are not fiduciary acts under ERISA