The Turtles panel: another environmental disaster in Geneva
Article Abstract:
The Turtles panel report has addressed the GATT-legality of an environmental trade embargo under the new World Trade Organization (WTO) system. The new system involves the automatic adoption of panel reports in dispute settlements, subject to a right of appeal to the Appellate Body of the WTO. The Turtles case involves a US embargo on shrimps imported from countries which do not have regulations comparable to that of the US to minimize incidental deaths of endangered species of sea turtles. The panel has concluded that measures which disrupt the competitive relationship among the products of the members of the GATT undermine the multilateral trading system and, therefore, constitutes "unjustified discrimination."
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The evolving relationship between trade and environmental regulation
Article Abstract:
The GATT has come under criticism from environmentalists for putting industry and trade matters higher than environmental concerns. The GATT has no regulations nor means of enforcing the existing domestic environmental laws of member nations. A nation may control, extract and assemble its resources into finished products without GATT interference. Environmental restrictions on the import of such products can be executed if they are proven to be non-discriminatory. However, an inconsistent or discriminatory tariff based on environmental concerns will conflict with existing GATT rules.
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Litigation process under the GATT dispute settlement system: lessons for the World Trade Organization?
Article Abstract:
A review of the dispute settlement procedures used for GATT suggests issues that will need to be addressed when creating a litigation process for the World Trade Organization (WTO). The GATT settlement process invoked some national law and only dealt with undisputed facts. This will not be possible for the WTO, which is likely to be dealing with less concrete issues, such as intellectual property and technology transfer. For this reason, procedural issues and rules of evidence will need to be very clearly spelled out in the WTO dispute resolution procedures.
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The neoliberal state, environmental pragmatism and its discontents. Participation and sustainable development: The post-ecologist transformation of citizen involvement in Denmark
- Abstracts: Free trade and environmental isolationism. American internationalism is no longer global
- Abstracts: The horses and the jumps: comments on the health care reform steeplechase. Waiting for the big one: confessions of a policy surfer looking for the universal health care wave
- Abstracts: Apostles of novelty. Post-scientific society. Evita or Madonna: whom will history remember?
- Abstracts: Labor law as an impediment to labor relations reform: leveling the playing field. Federal Labor relations 2000: introduction to the symposium