Motivated cognition and group interaction: need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations
Article Abstract:
Two experiments were performed to examine the possible effects of the need for cognitive closure on group behavior. In both, the four-person group participants act as members of a corporate committee that determines a monetary reward for deserving employees. In the first experiment, the need for closure serves as both a dispositional and situational variable. In the second, groups high on dispositional need for closure were compared with those low on this need. Findings suggested that there is a tendency by group members to focus on the group task rather than on the positive socioeconomic aspects of the group context when a need for closure is aroused.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Seizing on the latest: motivationally driven regency effects in impression formation
Article Abstract:
Research was conducted to examine the hypothesis that the need for closure increases the magnitude of recency effects in impression formation. Participants, who performed the impression formation task, were given the assigned goal only after having processed the target information with a different goal in mind. Time pressure and accuracy instructions were employed in the tests. Results indicate that the existence of an impression formation goal at the time that the information was initially encountered, was necessary to elicit primacy effects.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Informational length and order of presentation as determinants of persuasion
Article Abstract:
An important difference between prior operational definitions of 'cue' or 'heuristic' information versus 'message arguments' is explored. It is found that it is relative brevity and ordinal position rather than contents that ultimately explain the differences in persuative impact between 'cue/heuristic' versus 'message argument' information.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 2005
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Diagnosing corruption in Russia. Illegal migration in Russia: Factors, consequences, and problems of regulation
- Abstracts: Migration and European nationalism: France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Immigration as an election ploy
- Abstracts: Social control and the policing of terrorism: Foundations for sociology of counterterrorism. Developing a sociological theory for the empirical understanding of terrorism
- Abstracts: Operation Anaconda: Perception meets reality in the hills of Afghanistan. Stealing Al Qaeda's playbook
- Abstracts: Mental simulation and casual attribution: when simulating an event does not affect fault assignment