| International Journal of Public Administration 1997 |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| Administration as ritual: comforting or confounding? (response to article by Charles T. Goodsell, in this issue, p. 939)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Keehley, Patricia |
| Between nations and states: the American experience with centralizing government. (response to article by Ira Sharkansky, in this issue, p. 989)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Wrightson, Margaret |
| Conclusion.(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Marini, Frank |
| Controlling the bureaucracy. (response to article by Judith E. Gruber, in this issue, p. 1081)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Chandler, Ralph Clark |
| Implementing public action: populist bureaucracy and program politicians. (response to article by Beryl Radin and Terry Cooper, in this issue, p. 909)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | McCool, Daniel |
| Law: a curriculum necessity for public administration. (response to article by John A. Rohr, in this issue, p. 887)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | O'Leary, Rosemary |
| Leadership: myth and vision. (response to article by James W. Doig, in this issue, p. 861)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Stivers, Camilla |
| Looking outside more, inward less: expanding our attention in the search. (response to article by Louis C. Gawthrop, in this issue, p. 837)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Luke, Jeff S. |
| The bureaucrat: agent of democracy. (response to article by John P. Burke, in this issue, p. 1017)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Cleary, Robert E. |
| The dichotomy is alive and well: responsibility, ethics, and professionalism in the bureaucracy. (response to article by Kathryn G. Denhardt, in this issue, p. 1091)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Catron, Bayard L. |
| The problems of reconciling public service and civic humanism. (response to article by David K. Hart, in this issue, p. 967)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Grant, Nancy K. |
| The subjectivist approach to leadership: the need for more than description. (response to article by Dorothy Olshfski, in this issue, p. 1119)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Sun, Jong S. |
| Whose duty is it to say the king is naked? (response to article by Curtis Ventriss, in this issue, p. 1041)(Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, part 1) | Political science | Porter, David O. |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
