Facade and self-deception in the deteriorating financial firm
Article Abstract:
Financial executives and financial regulators sometimes agree to ignore facts whose overt recognition would precipitate a crisis. They use accounting facades to do this. The financial firm may also be jeopardized by executive self-deception. Two forms of this are optimistic biases and failure to canvas market alternatives adequately. The top executive officer may also exhibit a pattern of ever-accelerating risk-taking, resulting in 'turbo-deterioration' of the firm, or the firm may be so organized as to induce imprudent risk-taking at subordinate levels. Facades and self-deceptions pose important, unresolved issues of public policy and financial regulation. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: California Management Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0008-1256
Year: 1987
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The behavioral foundations of public policy-making
Article Abstract:
If the empirical assumptions of cognitive psychology were to replace the a priori postulates of economics, models of behavior would be more descriptively consistent and more accurate. On the other hand, if models that assume rationality were improved, the models would be more effective at predicting aggregate behavior. Policy analysts, who study behavior and its consequences, have more need for models with strong predictive, as opposed to descriptive, capabilities. Also, discarding models of rational behavior in favor of cognitive psychology may have no other effect than to replace one form of descriptive oversimplification for another.
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Efficiency and power: organizational economics meets organization theory
Article Abstract:
The contested terrain of paradigmatic approaches taken by economics and organization theories are highlighted. The in-built assumption of market economists and the built-in questioning of such assumptions by organization theorists forms the main argument concluding that neither approach has essentially developed theorizing and knowledge. The presence of one approach is perhaps only possible and derives force from the absences of others.
Publication Name: British Journal of Management
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 1045-3172
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Compound sets in mathematical programming modeling languages
- Abstracts: The ASEAN economies in the 1990s and Singapore's regional role. Auditing in the 1990s: implications for education and research
- Abstracts: Takeovers: it helps to know how to play the game. Using expert systems for job cost estimates. Cost defenses for antitrust cases
- Abstracts: Grasping the nettle: possibilities and pitfalls of a critical management pedagogy. Employee fitness programs: their impact on the employee and the organization
- Abstracts: New technologies, new skills. Is the "skills gap" really about attitudes? The financing threshold effect on success and failure of biomedical and pharmaceutical start-ups