PRPs can avoid some pollution exclusion barriers; potentially responsible parties may show that substances do not meet 'pollutant' definition
Article Abstract:
Potentially responsible parties (PRPs) can make valid legal arguments to obtain coverage for EPA claims under liability insurance policies. A settlement with insurance companies should be possible if the PRP knows its legal rights. The insurance company will first investigate factual matters in a PRP's EPA claim and will probably deny coverage or a duty to defend based on a pollution exclusion clause in the policy. After completing this process, the carrier may agree to defend the claim, but an initial denial based on a pollution exclusion clause in the policy is much more likely.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
New encryption rules relax some restrictions; the regulations make it easier for exporters to avoid licenses but still require agency review
Article Abstract:
The Bureau of Exchange and Export Administration (BXA) has primary authority for the regulation of cryptographic technology although, to meet concerns of the national security and law enforcement communities, there is also an interagency review process involving the Departments of State and Defense, the National Security Agency and the FBI. Any one of these agencies can stop the issuance of a license. Amendments to BXA rules announced at the end of 1998 purport to liberalize matters.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Will architectural works law have a chilling effect? Designers worry that 1990 act will force them to add original elements just to avoid liability
Article Abstract:
The effect of the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCP Act), passed to make US copyright law accord with the Berne Convention, are discussed. The AWCP Act discusses which elements of a typical architectural design copyright does not protect and what protection exists for derivative architectural works.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Risks of EPLI coverage prove difficult to assess; employment practices liability insurance presents risk factors not found in other policy forms
- Abstracts: Is America an indispensable (global) nation? Voluntary disclosure of mission statements in corporate annual reports: signaling what and to whom?
- Abstracts: Business is way too eager to settle. Violations of COPPA continue; most companies don't comply, says one study; FTC has taken action
- Abstracts: IP poses opportunities during economic straits; the Asian economic crisis is no time to ignore patents: valuable assets with lengthy lifespans
- Abstracts: 'Qualitex' makes visible the strategic spectrum; corporate 'color warriors' have various tactics at their disposal