The disfranchisement of the elderly, and other attempts to secure intergenerational justice
Article Abstract:
An analysis of intergenerational justice, which could be described as a facet of the consequentialist research and action program, is conducted. The program is a combination of the Rawls and Machiavellian component of social justice. Rawls' concept articulates equal concern and equal respect while Machiavelli's refers to political institutions that shape the right collective outcome. It turns out that disfranchising the elderly is only one of at least seven different ways to change the balance of electoral power between various age categories. Enfranchising younger people is proven to be a good idea that would allow intergenerational justice.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Institutions and the demands of justice
Article Abstract:
It is argued that all fundamental normative principles that apply to the design of institutions are also applicable to the conduct of people. This is in sharp contrast to John Rawls' statement that the principles of justice for institutions should not be confused with those principles that apply to individuals. The same criterion has always been used by utilitarians in evaluating both institutions and personal conduct. In much the same manner, legal, political and other social institutions must not constitute a separate normative realm.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A relatively plausible principle of beneficence: reply to Mulgan
Article Abstract:
A response to the comments of Tim Mulgan on 'The Demands of Beneficence maintained that the Cooperative Principle may have the most relative probability. It also asserted that Mulgan's contentions are not applicable to all forms of collective consequentialism but rather only against a moral theory categorically motivated by the Compliance Condition, such as the Cooperative Principle.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The fragile victory of French ecologists. Vulnerability and disobedience: New repertoires in French environmental protests
- Abstracts: The status of the Uniform guidelines on Employee selection procedures. Separating Law and professional practice from politics
- Abstracts: Who 'CoPed' out at Kyoto? An assessment of the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change
- Abstracts: The dynamics of popular reactions to democratization in Korea. How democracies control the military
- Abstracts: The United States and the prospects for NPT extension. Report of the Canberra Commission on the elimination of nuclear weapons